3) 1*****u and 1g ram unless ur big like kohl

>>3683 not true at all. Get 3 site visitors and shit slows down fast.

>>3683 I opened 2 browsers and the server load said 100 percent.

golang or rust is way faster than js will ever be. I would recommend the 32 g ram.

>>3686 >>3684 ur doing something wrong

1. If ram is a concern, use disk media files and make sure native functions are working.

>>3705 Yes, but the general use paradox still exists. For overall use case, im just wondering which server would be best. the 8 *****u's are super fast, that would be cool with 16g ram. BUT the 32 g ram has 4 decent *****u's that sever seems cool too cuz of all the ram. Im just wondering for the general reliability and efficiency of the server which option would be best. Granted, it depends on use case so its a beginners stupid question... yet i still wonder about the answer.

16GB and 4 Cores is more than enough for a site like Kohlchan

>>3710 Maybe, but files are the prob. Large gif files for example can ***** shit up in a hurry. I think that Mr Lynx should make a voluntary script to test server load and such on lots of different chans. ONE thing the public in general does NOT have are some sort of sensible benchmark or idea about what types of servers are best for what use case, and WHERE the points of diminishing returns are so someone does not spend too much money for nothing. >>3710

Lynxchan is the only imageboard... others just pretend they are under dev but they ALL suck. ALL other chans besides lynxchan are *****ing dumpster fires that waste ppls time.